Rank
Technical SEO
The foundations. If search engines cannot crawl, render and understand your site quickly, nothing else you do about SEO will land.
Technical SEO is the least glamorous part of search and the part most often skipped, because it produces no visible deliverable a client can read. It is also the part that silently caps everything else: a site that renders slowly, blocks its own crawlers, or serves three URLs for the same page will underperform no matter how good the writing is.
We audit against what search engines actually do — crawl, render, index — rather than against a checklist tool score, and then fix what we find in priority order.
What's included
Crawl and index audit
What Google can reach, what it is wasting budget on, and what it has quietly dropped. Orphan pages, redirect chains, broken canonicals and accidental noindex tags are all common and all invisible from the front end.
Core Web Vitals and rendering
Real load performance on a mid-range phone, not a desktop score. Layout shift, slow largest paint and render-blocking scripts fixed at source rather than masked by a caching plugin.
Structured data
Schema markup for your organisation, products, articles and questions, validated rather than assumed — and matching what the page visibly shows, because Google checks that.
Site architecture and internal linking
Making sure the pages that matter are reachable in a few clicks and supported by internal links, so authority reaches them instead of pooling on the homepage.
Duplicate and thin content
Consolidating pages that compete with each other, which is the most common self-inflicted ranking problem we find.
Who this is for
- Sites with plenty of content that still do not rank
- Businesses whose traffic fell after a migration, redesign or platform change
- Anyone told their site has "SEO issues" without a specific explanation
Common questions
General SEO decides what to say and which terms to target. Technical SEO decides whether search engines can read, understand and trust the site well enough for any of that to count. If both are needed we usually do the technical work first, because content published onto a broken foundation has to be re-crawled anyway.
If we built it, no — this work is already part of the build. If someone else built it recently, a short audit is usually worth it, because the defaults in most themes and page builders are not good and the problems are cheapest to fix before content accumulates on top of them.
Sometimes dramatically, if something specific is holding the site back — a blocked crawler or a rendering problem can suppress an otherwise good site entirely. More often it removes a ceiling rather than adding traffic by itself, and the gain shows once content and links follow. We will tell you which situation yours looks like after the audit.
Tell us what you need built.
A couple of sentences is enough to start. You get a real reply within four hours.